Council at odds over "confused" school transport vote

Hereford Times: Pupils such as these, from Brimield and Orleton, may have to reconsider where they go to secondary school. Pupils such as these, from Brimield and Orleton, may have to reconsider where they go to secondary school.

A HIGH stakes vote that backed charges for school transport – but didn’t – has Herefordshire Council at odds.

Opposition members want a scrutiny inquiry into how unanimous support for an amendment that apparently kept school transport free for at least another year seemingly became backing for charges from September.

But the council is standing by its interpretation of the vote saying there is no change in plans to introduce charges.

Many members left last Friday’s budget meeting believing their vote had kept the charges at bay while a transition fund was set up to help schools adjust.

By Monday, the message was mixed with the council saying the charges would still be introduced-  with a transition fund set up to help.

Independent group leader Councillor Sebastian Bowen, who proposed the motion, said the amendment was for no changes from September with free transport maintained for at least another year - allowing for a transition fund.

“Members came away believing there would be no charges from  September – if the council is saying otherwise then that is wholly out of order and warrants investigation. As the proposer, I want that investigation,” he said.

The motion was seconded by Conservative councillor John Stone.

“My understanding was that free school transport was re-instated for those receiving it, as clearly stated in the amendment, while a transition fund was created for schools to make arrangements in future. This was clearly understood by members, I wouldn’t have supported the amendment otherwise,” he said.

Councillor Mark Hubbard, of It’s Our County, said that charges from September were not what members voted for.

“It’s hard to get our heads around the doublespeak that says otherwise. The amendment was clearly proposed to maintain free transport for a year and set up a transition fund,” he said.

Councillor Alan Seldon, chairman of the council’s overview and scrutiny committee also said his understanding of the vote maintain the status quo and he was “not best pleased" by suggestions otherwise.

Coun Seldon said he was looking at the scope for a scrutiny hearing into what went on having already contacted the council’s monitoring officer and deputy monitoring officer for explanations.

In a statement issued this afternoon (Tues)  the council stands by its interpretation of the vote.

The statement says the amendment “clearly stated” that £112,000 would be diverted from a one off budget identified to support Hereford’s western outer relief road and used to continue to work for integrated commissioning of all public transport, and create a transition fund to enable schools to develop responses to the changes to the home to school transport policy.

Supporting the council’s case the statement says:

“The proposed amendment was available on the council’s website on Thursday 6 February and all councillors were provided with a hard copy at the meeting.  There was a full and in depth discussion of the amendment during the meeting before all councillors unanimously agreed to it.

“This decision does not change the policy position for home to school transport set by cabinet in December, which will take effect in September 2014.  However, by identifying a one off transition fund, full council has identified important financial support to help schools and parents manage the transition.  A further report on the options and criteria for using the fund will be made to cabinet in March. “

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:47am Wed 12 Feb 14

Simon Brown says...

Why not go the whole way a burn down the Reichstag?
Why not go the whole way a burn down the Reichstag? Simon Brown

12:15pm Wed 12 Feb 14

Herefordian07 says...

The council is good at saying one thing yet meaning another, for example we were told that existing business's in Hereford would not be allowed to move into the OLM as it would cause a vacuum in the historic city centre, well just look at who is moving in, I think the council speaks with a fork tongue!
The council is good at saying one thing yet meaning another, for example we were told that existing business's in Hereford would not be allowed to move into the OLM as it would cause a vacuum in the historic city centre, well just look at who is moving in, I think the council speaks with a fork tongue! Herefordian07

12:57pm Wed 12 Feb 14

fmrbill says...

in no way with what I am about to say does this mean I support this council goes I DONT, but as some body said some time ago, you have to question the opposition, if they don't even know, it would appear what the motion meant that they were voting on. We need good opposition to get the BUNCH OUT. I have faith/hope the opposition will buck up their ideas, and believe it will happen but shame we got to wait till 2015 for it.
in no way with what I am about to say does this mean I support this council goes I DONT, but as some body said some time ago, you have to question the opposition, if they don't even know, it would appear what the motion meant that they were voting on. We need good opposition to get the BUNCH OUT. I have faith/hope the opposition will buck up their ideas, and believe it will happen but shame we got to wait till 2015 for it. fmrbill

12:41pm Sat 15 Feb 14

littlewhitebull says...

The HT uses words about our council that include "at odd" and "confused".
Really? Is this news?
The HT uses words about our council that include "at odd" and "confused". Really? Is this news? littlewhitebull

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree