Planning appeal to bring back conversion of Castle Inn, Little Birch

The Castle Inn in Little Birch has been closed for some time <i>(Image: Google Street View)</i>
The Castle Inn in Little Birch has been closed for some time (Image: Google Street View)
This article is brought to you by our exclusive subscriber partnership with our sister title USA Today, and has been written by our American colleagues. It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald.
Close Icon

Find, save and share Public Notices that affect you in the area.

Search the Public Notice Portal What is the Public Notice Portal?

What is the Public Notice Portal?

The Public Notice Portal carries statutory public notices published in local newspapers and is the fastest and most effective way of finding out what is happening in YOUR neighbourhood.

Search the Public Notice Portal

The owner of a closed Herefordshire village pub is appealing against the council’s refusal to permit her to turn it into a five-bedroom home.

Denise “Dee” Langford, owner of the Castle Inn in Little Birch south of Hereford, was told by county planners last month that she had provided “insufficient evidence” that the pub, which closed in 2020, “is no longer required, viable, or fit for purpose”.

She had also failed to show the pub had been sufficiently marketed “at a realistic price” as a pub, or that an alternative venue was available nearby – so conflicting with local, county and national policy.

RELATED NEWS:

Ms Langford has now taken the case to the Government’s Planning Inspectorate in a bid to have the refusal overturned.

The “history of declining trade, failed reopening, prolonged closure and unsuccessful marketing” of the pub “has not been given sufficient weight” in the council’s decision, her appeal claims, arguing that simply lowering its sale price “would not resolve underlying viability issues”.

OTHER NEWS:

Planners had “assumed continuing community demand” for the pub “without objective evidence”, while giving “insufficient positive weight to the provision of (an) additional dwelling”.

Ms Langford was also “not given a reasonable opportunity to address alleged evidential deficiencies before refusal”, she claims.

The Planning Inspectorate has confirmed the appeal will be by written representations rather than an in-person inquiry.

Get involved
with the news

Send your news & photos