An ex-West Mercia Police constable who lied on his application form would have been sacked had he still been part of the force.
Former PC Jamie Hogarth repeatedly failed to disclose driving and public order offences he committed before joining the force.
When Hogarth joined the force in 2019, he failed to disclose that he had been penalised for speeding, he had been issued a warning for urinating in a public place in 2017, and he had provided a misleading account of an assault investigation in 2015.
It was also alleged that, when Hogarth applied to transfer to North Wales Police in 2022, he failed to disclose urinating in a public place in 2017, and the details of the assault investigation in 2015.
Hogarth had told the police that he had stopped an assault by a member of the public in his hometown in Scotland, and that false allegations were made about him, which later went to court but were thrown out after the complainant admitted to making it up.
When North Wales Police investigated the assault, they found that Hogarth had picked up a man's crutches from the floor and hit him with them, causing him to bite his own lip.
Hogarth was later arrested and charged for the incident.
He said that he did not understand disclosure or the vetting process, and that he was not deliberately misleading West Mercia Police by failing to disclose speeding and urinating in a public place.
However, the panel felt that the vetting form was clear and unambiguous and that he had knowingly omitted information.
It said: "Two separate incidents were omitted from this vetting form, and the assault was referred to in detail, albeit in a factual way that benefited the officer, rather than being truthful.
"This suggests considerable thought rather than a lack of understanding and, further, a pattern of behaviour."
Hogarth had resigned from the force in April 2024, after the allegations were made but before the misconduct hearing was held.
He was not present at the hearing on Thursday, February 12.
The panel found that, due to Hogarth's repeatedly deciding to lie about his past and the damage his conduct could have on public confidence in the police, his behaviour was gross misconduct.
It was decided that Hogarth would have been dismissed from the force had he not already left, and he would be placed on the College of Policing's Barred list.
Share