Decision on agricultural occupancy condition at Brinsop home

Mullens Chase, Brinsop (from Google Street View)
Mullens Chase, Brinsop (from Google Street View)
This article is brought to you by our exclusive subscriber partnership with our sister title USA Today, and has been written by our American colleagues. It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald.
Close Icon

Find, save and share Public Notices that affect you in the area.

Search the Public Notice Portal What is the Public Notice Portal?

What is the Public Notice Portal?

The Public Notice Portal carries statutory public notices published in local newspapers and is the fastest and most effective way of finding out what is happening in YOUR neighbourhood.

Search the Public Notice Portal

A Herefordshire couple have been told that the breach of an agricultural occupancy clause on their rural bungalow cannot now lead to enforcement action.

Mullens Chase in the village of Brinsop northwest of Hereford was given planning permission in 1965 on condition that its occupation “shall be limited to persons employed locally in agriculture” and their dependants.

In March, Edward Thomas applied to Herefordshire Council for a certificate of lawfulness confirming that, with the condition having been breached for over 10 years, it had become immune from enforcement.

RELATED NEWS :

He submitted a sworn declaration, supported by payslips, that from before the beginning of 2015 until the present day, the house had been occupied by himself and his wife Sara, neither having been at any point employed in farming.


Stay updated with all the latest Herefordshire news that matters to you!

 Read the local news and stay informed with our advert-free app, read the paper before anyone else via: The Digital Edition, gain unlimited access to Hereford Times website, and much more.


Despite a target date being given to determine the application by 17 June, case officer Matthew Neilson has only now ruled, five months on, that the certificate of lawfulness can be issued.

“The evidence appears to be sufficiently clear and unambiguous in confirming that the dwelling has not been occupied in accordance with the requirements of the planning condition… since at least January 2015,” he concluded.

“The period in which enforcement action could be taken against the breach of condition has now expired.”

Get involved
with the news

Send your news & photos