Rural house can be occupied by non-farmers

The house, Cwm Derw, in Herefordshire's Golden Valley (Google Street View), where Highland cattle have been kept on adjoining land (Pixabay, CC0 licence)
The house, Cwm Derw, in Herefordshire's Golden Valley (Google Street View), where Highland cattle have been kept on adjoining land (Pixabay, CC0 licence)
This article is brought to you by our exclusive subscriber partnership with our sister title USA Today, and has been written by our American colleagues. It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald.
Close Icon

Find, save and share Public Notices that affect you in the area.

Search the Public Notice Portal What is the Public Notice Portal?

What is the Public Notice Portal?

The Public Notice Portal carries statutory public notices published in local newspapers and is the fastest and most effective way of finding out what is happening in YOUR neighbourhood.

Search the Public Notice Portal

This story is only available to Hereford Times subscribers.
Click here to find out why and how to subscribe for exclusive stories.

A Herefordshire widow has been told that a rule requiring her house to be occupied by a farmer no longer applies.

The dormer bungalow Cwm Derw at Quarry Farm near Dorstone in the southwest of the county could only be occupied by someone working locally in agriculture or forestry, their dependants, widow or widower, according to the original 1986 planning permission.

But a Mr and Mrs Handley had lived there, despite neither working on the land, since 1999, according to Mrs Handley’s application to Herefordshire Council, which sought a certificate of lawfulness confirming the condition could no longer be enforced.

RELATED NEWS:

Under planning law, this can be issued if the breach has continued for over ten years – but the burden of proof is on the applicant to show this.


What are your thoughts?

You can send a letter to the editor to have your say by clicking here.

Letters should not exceed 250 words and local issues take precedence.


The late Mr Handley had “always” worked as a carpenter, while Mrs Handley “has mainly been a housewife” – though the couple had kept Highland cattle “as a hobby” and were “not real farmers”, her application said.

Planning officer Tracey Meachen has now agreed that the cattle “have never been part of an agricultural business that rears cattle for the purposes of producing meat, milk or leather from the hide”.

With no contrary evidence having been put forward, she concluded that the current, non-agricultural occupancy of the house “is lawful given that the time in which enforcement action could be taken has now expired”.

Get involved
with the news

Send your news & photos