Decision on cottage’s ‘draconian’ farmer occupancy rule

Oakleigh 'would not have been permitted without agricultural tie' (image: Google Street View)
Oakleigh 'would not have been permitted without agricultural tie' (image: Google Street View)
This article is brought to you by our exclusive subscriber partnership with our sister title USA Today, and has been written by our American colleagues. It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald.
Close Icon

Find, save and share Public Notices that affect you in the area.

Search the Public Notice Portal What is the Public Notice Portal?

What is the Public Notice Portal?

The Public Notice Portal carries statutory public notices published in local newspapers and is the fastest and most effective way of finding out what is happening in YOUR neighbourhood.

Search the Public Notice Portal

A 1960s bungalow in the Herefordshire countryside needn’t have a farming occupant, it has been ruled – four decades after this ceased to be the case.

A condition on the planning approval to build Oakleigh, which stands some way from neighbouring properties northwest of Orleton in the north of the county, was that it could only house someone working in farming, and their dependents.

Seeking to have this overturned, Michael Sparey, son of the original applicant, claimed the condition was “more restrictive and draconian than one would expect to find in modern planning permissions”, as it did not permit occupation by retired, unemployed or incapacitated farm workers or their widows.

RELATED NEWS:

Mr Sparey senior retired from farming in 1983 and died four years later – meaning the condition had been breached since then and was therefore unenforceable due to the passage of time, the application for a certificate of lawfulness maintained.

Planning officer Jack Dyer explained that such cases place the onus on the applicant to demonstrate the lawfulness of their claim, “on the balance of probabilities”.

With no evidence presented to the contrary, despite widespread public interest in the case, he concluded Mr Sparey’s evidence “is sufficiently precise and unambiguous to justify the grant of a certificate on the balance of probability”.

Get involved
with the news

Send your news & photos