Final verdict on plan for LED ad board in Leominster

The site at the junction of Worcester Road and Clinton Road in Leominster where the sign, inset, was to go <i>(Image: Google Street View; Turnkey, from application)</i>
The site at the junction of Worcester Road and Clinton Road in Leominster where the sign, inset, was to go (Image: Google Street View; Turnkey, from application)
This article is brought to you by our exclusive subscriber partnership with our sister title USA Today, and has been written by our American colleagues. It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald.
Close Icon

Find, save and share Public Notices that affect you in the area.

Search the Public Notice Portal What is the Public Notice Portal?

What is the Public Notice Portal?

The Public Notice Portal carries statutory public notices published in local newspapers and is the fastest and most effective way of finding out what is happening in YOUR neighbourhood.

Search the Public Notice Portal

A plan to put up an illuminated advertising sign in a Herefordshire town has been killed off after a government inspector said it would be “strikingly alien” and even dangerous.

Hintons Country & Garden of Worcester Road, Leominster applied last December for permission to install a six-by-three-metre LED board, raised two metres off the ground, to display ads to passing drivers.

The firm claimed at the time that the sign would “cause no material harm to either amenity or public safety”.

RELATED NEWS:

Herefordshire Council’s highways engineer disagreed, saying it “would cause distraction to vehicles… which could lead to a severe impact on highways safety”.

For this reason, and due to its likely visual intrusiveness, in March the application was refused.


What are your thoughts?

You can send a letter to the editor to have your say by clicking here.

Letters should not exceed 250 words and local issues take precedence.


Hintons then appealed against the refusal to the government’s Planning Inspectorate.

But planning inspector Nigel McGurk has now sided with the council, saying the proposed sign’s “imposing height would combine with its prominent location, large size and LED screen to result in it appearing as an obtrusive feature that would dominate its surroundings”.

OTHER NEWS:

It would be “a strikingly alien feature, out of character with its surroundings”, he said.

On the safety issue, he said the proposed spot for the sign was “directly opposite a junction commonly used by vehicles of all types and sizes”, with “little room in the highway for vehicles travelling in opposite directions to pass safely”.

The sign “would draw the attention of road-users in a sensitive location, where any distraction runs the significant risk of placing pedestrians, cyclists and other road-users in danger”, he concluded, and dismissed the appeal.

Get involved
with the news

Send your news & photos