CABINET control of Herefordshire Council could be over ahead of the next local elections.
A groundbreaking motion to abolish cabinet will be put to a full council vote on September 26.
The motion is proposed by Cllr Terry James, Lib-Dem group leader, who headed the council’s first cabinet in 1999.
Support for the motion is expected from the Independent group and It’s Our County (IOC).
A combined opposition vote would defeat any Tory attempt to defend cabinet.
The Tory group currently controls the council – through cabinet – as a minority.
Should the abolition motion succeed, the council would have to prepare for the end of cabinet ahead of the local election in May.
That will most likely mean a complete re-write of the council’s constitution.
Alternatives to cabinet include a wider ranging committee system and more voting power for the full council.
Cllr James said successive cabinets had come to forget their purpose to appear as little more than a body delegating decisions to officers rather than running the council.
“We see millions of pounds being spent on setting up new offices at Plough Lane and Hereford Shirehall while grass doesn’t get cut to save a few thousand,” he said.
Dissatisfaction with the cabinet system has simmered on the council’s “backbenches” for some years.
Many members believe cabinet stifles their voice and diminishes the role of ward councillor.
Equally long-running are concerns over “closed doors” when key or sensitive decisions are discussed.
IOC leader councillor Anthony Powers said his party was already “actively exploring” alternatives to cabinet that could be presented as policy.
“There is a need to re-build the council’s decision-making processes. Cabinet leaves too many decisions to too few, more councillors should be getting a greater say in decisions,” said Cllr Powers.
Cllr Bob Matthews, Independent group leader, said his members wanted “changes in some form” to decision making ahead of the election.
Those changes, said Cllr Matthews, centred on ideas around a system that was based more around specific committees than a single cabinet – spreading the scope of representation.
Cabinet, as such, could be made up of the committee chairman with the council leader getting the casting vote, he said.
The role of scrutiny is widely seen as in need of an overhaul too.
In May, the Independents and Tories took control of the overview and scrutiny committee, ousting the IOC chairman and deputy chairman.
That move brought fears over the political and strategic function of scrutiny - as a body specifically set up to challenge cabinet decision making – to the fore.
The concept of a cabinet was one the first executive issues to face Herefordshire Council from its start in 1998.
Then, a government white paper outlined the abolition of traditional committee and sub-committee systems, seen as diffusing responsibility and leaving voters unclear as where decision making powers lay.
The then group leaders were united on the idea of a cabinet that met only behind closed doors – as the white paper allowed.
Arguments in favour of closed doors cited the “openness” offered by mixed party scrutiny committees responsible for specific service areas.
The Hereford Times led calls for cabinet to open its doors, but resistance to the body meeting in public continued to January 2000 ahead of a reform motion being put to full council .
That motion was headed off in the chamber, with the then council leader Cllr James conceding that cabinet proceedings would go public.
The size of cabinet, and the roles available within it, has fluctuated since with opposition leaders allowed a say at each meeting and local members when issues specific to constituencies were discussed.